<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REVIEW: Gibson Dark Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html</link>
	<description>Guitar news, reviews, interviews, videos and lessons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignited We Stand</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-7645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignited We Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-7645</guid>
		<description>Aljon! Great guy. Great guitar too. However, I imagine if something went wrong with it, you wouldn&#039;t be able to bring it to just any luthier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aljon! Great guy. Great guitar too. However, I imagine if something went wrong with it, you wouldn&#8217;t be able to bring it to just any luthier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>I recently spent about an hour playing with one of these in my shop, and I have to say, this is anything but intuitive. I followed the quick start instructions to the letter, and only got it to change tunings once. this thing is not just complicated, it&#039;s actually a huge pain in the ass. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;sure, it&#039;s a huge step up from the original robots. but that&#039;s not saying much. and considering the massive increase in the amount of available tones/tunings, I really think they should&#039;ve added another MCK. I don&#039;t feel like it&#039;d be asking too much to have a second MCK for controlling the chameleon tones. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And although it sounds good, there is still one fundamental issue. While the tuners move just fine, the saddles don&#039;t. While this sounds more in tune than the first generation of robots, it&#039;s still tough to play in higher positions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;so I guess my verdict is that while this guitar represents a huge step forwards in guitar technology, it&#039;s still too undeveloped to just pick up and play. if you&#039;re willing to invest the time, it has great potential. but this potential still hasn&#039;t been fully realized. give it more time, and Gibson will make something great out of this. At this point in time, considering the price, I&#039;d say it&#039;s not worth it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(also, as an aside, the fret edges were rough and crude. typical gibson.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently spent about an hour playing with one of these in my shop, and I have to say, this is anything but intuitive. I followed the quick start instructions to the letter, and only got it to change tunings once. this thing is not just complicated, it&#39;s actually a huge pain in the ass. </p>
<p>sure, it&#39;s a huge step up from the original robots. but that&#39;s not saying much. and considering the massive increase in the amount of available tones/tunings, I really think they should&#39;ve added another MCK. I don&#39;t feel like it&#39;d be asking too much to have a second MCK for controlling the chameleon tones. </p>
<p>And although it sounds good, there is still one fundamental issue. While the tuners move just fine, the saddles don&#39;t. While this sounds more in tune than the first generation of robots, it&#39;s still tough to play in higher positions. </p>
<p>so I guess my verdict is that while this guitar represents a huge step forwards in guitar technology, it&#39;s still too undeveloped to just pick up and play. if you&#39;re willing to invest the time, it has great potential. but this potential still hasn&#39;t been fully realized. give it more time, and Gibson will make something great out of this. At this point in time, considering the price, I&#39;d say it&#39;s not worth it.</p>
<p>(also, as an aside, the fret edges were rough and crude. typical gibson.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>but does anybody know something about the original gibson tone.does the dark fire has the original fat les paul tone.iam about to buy a new guitar but i cannot choose between the dark fire and the 68 reisiue gibson custom if somebody can help me i would be very happy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but does anybody know something about the original gibson tone.does the dark fire has the original fat les paul tone.iam about to buy a new guitar but i cannot choose between the dark fire and the 68 reisiue gibson custom if somebody can help me i would be very happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>I just got mine August 09 after placing a deposit on one in Nov 08. The ones originally released had problems. Gibson stopped delivering them to fix the problems. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To me it was worth the wait. Unlike most Gibsons, the workmanship is perfect. I have not found a single flaw, and I have scrutinized it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is no hum or noise. Everything works as advertised. The ability to change the sound of the guitar is limited only by my imagination. The sustain is better than any other guitar I own, including 2 Gibsons. The PLEK&#039;d neck has an incredibly low action and no buzz. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have not got around to using the RIP yet, I am enjoying the guitar too much just plugged into my amp to mess with setting that up yet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I absolutely love it, and for the asking price, think it is a much better buy than a Les Paul Standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got mine August 09 after placing a deposit on one in Nov 08. The ones originally released had problems. Gibson stopped delivering them to fix the problems. </p>
<p>To me it was worth the wait. Unlike most Gibsons, the workmanship is perfect. I have not found a single flaw, and I have scrutinized it. </p>
<p>There is no hum or noise. Everything works as advertised. The ability to change the sound of the guitar is limited only by my imagination. The sustain is better than any other guitar I own, including 2 Gibsons. The PLEK&#39;d neck has an incredibly low action and no buzz. </p>
<p>I have not got around to using the RIP yet, I am enjoying the guitar too much just plugged into my amp to mess with setting that up yet.</p>
<p>I absolutely love it, and for the asking price, think it is a much better buy than a Les Paul Standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freddy1955</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>freddy1955</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>The DarkFire is pricey, but it has several genuine innovations.  I think I&#039;ll have to save up for one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DarkFire is pricey, but it has several genuine innovations.  I think I&#39;ll have to save up for one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hodgson</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hodgson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I didn&#039;t mean to imply Gibson designed it, just that they use it. I&#039;ll amend the article to clarify this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I didn&#39;t mean to imply Gibson designed it, just that they use it. I&#39;ll amend the article to clarify this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://iheartguitarblog.com/2009/08/review-gibson-dark-fire.html#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iheartguitarblog.com/?p=876#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>&quot;The frets are shaped with Gibson’s PLEK system&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its not Gibson&#039;s PLEK.. its PLEK&#039;s PLEK. Gibson just uses the equipment like Suhr, G&amp;L and many others...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The frets are shaped with Gibson’s PLEK system&quot;</p>
<p>Its not Gibson&#39;s PLEK.. its PLEK&#39;s PLEK. Gibson just uses the equipment like Suhr, G&amp;L and many others&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

